Website Builders with Lowest Carbon Footprint in 2024
Liam Artman
All our actions leave a carbon footprint, and we can only reduce it by causing less harm to the environment. We tested website builders using two services to determine the carbon footprint of websites: Greenpixie and Website Carbon. The rating includes 10 website builders. For each site, we provide the test results and supporting screenshots.
Maximum score:
100
Average score:
40
Website Builders with Lowest Carbon Footprint in 2024
| #1 for Carbon Footprint |
Site123
Read our Site123 Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Site123 has an average carbon footprint score of 78, making it one of the lowest emitters among the website builders analyzed. This suggests that Site123 has a positive environmental impact and users who prioritize eco-friendliness might need to consider this factor when choosing their website platform.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 78 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 83 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 72 / 100 |
| #2 for Carbon Footprint |
Bazium
Read our Bazium Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Bazium's carbon footprint stands at 72 units. Although slightly lower than Site123, it still represents a considerably low environmental footprint. This signifies that Bazium is a suitable choice for ecologically conscious users.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 72 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 74 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 69 / 100 |
| #3 for Carbon Footprint |
Jimdo
Read our Jimdo Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Jimdo's average carbon emission is 56 units, placing it in the mid-range of the website builders evaluated. This indicates a moderate level of environmental impact. Jimdo might appeal to users who are looking for a balance between ease of use and a somewhat lower carbon footprint compared to higher emitters.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 56/ 100 |
| Greenpixie | 47 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 64 / 100 |
| #4 for Carbon Footprint |
GoDaddy
Read our GoDaddy Review for a detailed look at the website builder
With a carbon footprint score of 42, based solely on Greenpixie results, as this platform is unsuitable for analysis at Website Carbon, GoDaddy is our top 4 lowest emitters in this comparison. This makes it a relatively eco-friendly choice for users concerned about their environmental impact.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 42 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 42 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | - / 100 |
| #5 for Carbon Footprint |
Durable
Read our Durable Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Durable has a carbon footprint score of 36, making it not a really green option that is safe for ecology. Its relatively high emission rates nake it unsuitable for users who are particularly environmentally conscious.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 36 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 35 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 37 / 100 |
| #6 for Carbon Footprint |
Weebly
Read our Weebly Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Weebly has an average carbon footprint score of 32. This places it on the lower end of the spectrum, indicating a relatively worse carbon footprint. Users looking for an environmental consciousness might find Weebly not a perfect option.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 32 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 33 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 31 / 100 |
| #7 for Carbon Footprint |
Wix
Read our Wix Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Wix, with a carbon footprint score of 32 , shares the same carbon footprint as Weebly. It is not the best choice for those who want a website builder that is mindful of the environmental impact.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 32 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 32 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 32 / 100 |
| #8 for Carbon Footprint |
Squarespace
Read our Squarespace Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Squarespace’s carbon footprint score of 22, makes it one of the least eco-friendly options compared to many others. Its relatively high emissions make it unsuitable for environmentally conscious users.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 22 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 4 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 39 / 100 |
| #9 for Carbon Footprint |
Duda
Read our Duda Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Duda has a carbon footprint score of 17 . This positions it as one of the least environmentally friendly choices available, which users who prioritize sustainability should avoid.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 17 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 6 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 27 / 100 |
| #10 for Carbon Footprint |
Webflow
Read our Webflow Review for a detailed look at the website builder
Webflow has the lowest score in our rating, indicating a very high carbon footprint. This makes Webflow the worst choice for users who are highly concerned about minimizing their environmental impact.
| Average Carbon Footprint | 9 / 100 |
| Greenpixie | 3 / 100 |
| Website Carbon | 15 / 100 |
